Search Results For: 'mac Pro'
UPDATE: Users in comments and elsewhere are reporting similar issues with books and music, and Apple has now updated its status page. Users are experiencing a problem with the App Store. We are investigating and will update the status as more information becomes available. UPDATE 2: Apple says the issue is now resolved. A number of and Twitter users are reporting problems searching both iOS and Mac App Stores, with major iOS apps like, Spotify and Google Apps failing to show up in search results – and even Apple’s own Xcode failing to show in of the Mac App Store. I’m seeing the same issues myself.
Others are reporting incorrect search results, such as iPhone apps being shown in iPad-only searches and vice-versa. App Store searches are pretty broken at the best of times, but this does appear to be a specific glitch.
Outlook displays the search results on the Search tab. Note: To perform a comprehensive search of all Outlook files (regardless of folder or view), choose All. How to Switch Search Engines on Mac OS X and iOS (And Why You Should) Posted on. And explicit content is blocked in search results by default. And PhotoActive, and a regular contributor to The Mac Security Blog, TidBITS, and several other websites and publications. Kirk has written more than twenty books, including Take Control books.
At the time of writing, Apple’s is not yet showing the issue (update: it is now), but it’s typical for the page to be updated some time after users report problems. However, Apple Support has stated that it is aware of an ongoing issue with search and is working to resolve the problem.
It has confirmed that no apps have been pulled from the store.
Say you want to look up a topic online, so you type a search word or phrase into Safari's address bar. The first link in the returned results looks promising, so you click it. On the site you're sent to, you see another link about a related topic, so you click that, too. Moments later another link grabs your attention, and you check it out.
Soon you're distracted by some other tangential subject, and before you know it you've fallen down a rabbit hole of clicks and links without finding out much about what you were actually looking for in the first place. If that sounds familiar, Safari SnapBack can help you. It's a long-standing feature of Apple's desktop web browser that's often overlooked, but saves having to tediously click the previous page button multiple times to return to your original search results, or start rooting through your web history to locate where your latest online meander began.
You can find it in Safari's menu bar, under History - Search Results SnapBack, or even better, use its Command-Option-S keyboard shortcut. As the name suggests, SnapBack instantly takes you back to your original search results, although the function's availability depends on a couple of conditions. First, SnapBack only works if your wayward browsing occurred in the same tab that you used to initiate the search, so if a link you clicked on opened a new tab and you continued browsing in that, the SnapBack menu option will be grayed out. Second, the search needs to be performed from Safari's address bar or from the website of the search engine that Safari is set to use. To change the browser's default search engine, select Safari - Preferences.
Search Results For Mac Product By Serial Number
From the menu bar, click the Search tab, and choose one from the Search engine: dropdown menu. Your options are Google, Yahoo, Bing, and DuckDuckGo. Next time you use the search engine you select and get lost in myriad clicks, SnapBack will be available to help get you back on track. I think some people want to show they approve or agree with a topic or post, but don't have anything to necessarily add to it.
Search Results For Mac Protect
For me, it can also help keep erroneous posts and clutter down as well. My $.02 I get those aspects of it, I was wondering more about liking it when it comes to the first post with the article itself (being posted by a bot basically), but I guess in the sense of showing appreciation of that type of article that perhaps the MR editors can see and maybe take note of, that can be useful.